Contact angle study on the activation mechanisms of sphalerite with Cu(II) and Pb(II)

Authors

  • G. I. Dávila Pulido CINVESTAV-IPN
  • A. Uribe Salas CINVESTAV-IPN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/revmetalm.1048

Keywords:

Sphalerite, Copper activation, Lead activation, Flotation, Contact angle

Abstract


This article presents results of an experimental study on the sphalerite activation with Cu(II) and Pb(II), whose main objective was to investigate the activation mechanisms and to evaluate the magnitude of the hydrophobization achieved with both chemical species. The hydrophobicity acquired by the mineral due to the interaction with the activator and collector (sodium isopropyl xanthate) is characterized making use of the contact angle technique. The results show that Cu(II) replaces the Zn of the external layers of the mineral, promoting the sulfide (S2–) oxidation to produce a mixture of CuS, Cu2S and S°, of hydrophobic nature. The subsequent interaction with xanthate increases the hydrophobicity of the mineral surface. In turn, Pb(II) activation of sphalerite is due to the formation of a PbS layer that reacts with xanthate to produce hydrophobic species (e.g., PbX2). It is also observed that the hydrophobicity of sphalerite activated with Pb(II) is favored under air atmospheres, as compared to that obtained under nitrogen atmospheres. It is concluded that the hydrophobicity achieved by lead activation may be of the same order of magnitude to that deliverately induced by copper activation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] P.J. Guy y W.J. Trahar, Flotation of Sulphide Minerals, Developments in Mineral Processing 6, Ed. Forssberg, Amsterdam, 1985, pp. 91-110.

[2] M.C. Fuerstenau y P. Somasundaran, Flotation. En Principles of Mineral Processing (M.C. Fuerstenau y K.N. Han, Eds.). SME, EE.UU., 2003, pp. 245-306.

[3] T.T. Chau, Miner. Eng., 22 (2009) 213-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2008.07.009

[4] P.T.L. Koh y M.P. Schwarz, Miner. Eng., 19 (2006) 619-626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2005.09.013

[5] I.W. Wark y A.B. Cox, Transactions of the American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers 112 (1934) 189-244.

[6] N. P. Finkelstein, Int. J. Miner. Process. 52 (1997) pp. 81-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-7516(97)00067-7

[7] A.P. Chandra y A.R. Gerson, Adv. Colloid. Interfac. Sci. 145 (2009) 97-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2008.09.001 PMid:18851843

[8] C.A. Prestidge, W.M. Skinner, J. Ralston y R.St.C. Smart, Appl. Surf. Sci. 108 (1997) 333-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4332(96)00681-2

[9] A.C.P. Duarte y S.R. Grano, Miner. Eng., 20 (2007) 766-775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2007.02.012

[10] W.J. Trahar, G.D. Senior, G.W. Heyes y M.D. Creed, Int. J. Miner. Process. 49 (1997) 121-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-7516(96)00041-5

[11] E.T. Pecina, Tesis Doctoral, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Unidad Saltillo, México 2003.

Downloads

Published

2011-08-30

How to Cite

Dávila Pulido, G. I., & Uribe Salas, A. (2011). Contact angle study on the activation mechanisms of sphalerite with Cu(II) and Pb(II). Revista De Metalurgia, 47(4), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.3989/revmetalm.1048

Issue

Section

Articles