Influence of the roughening method, joint configuration and adhesive thickness on the shear strength of ferritic stainless steel surfaces joined by methyl methacrylate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/revmetalm.120Keywords:
Design of experiments, Joint configuration, Methyl methacrylate, Shear strength, Surface rougheningAbstract
Surface roughening, joint configuration, and adhesive thickness were selected as factors to analyze, by using a 23 design of experiments, the adhesive joint of AISI 430 steel using Methyl Methacrylate. Scanning electron microscopy observations, roughness-contour measurement and wettability analysis were performed on the adherents to analyze the adhesion, roughness, surface contour and shear strength on the adhesion tests. The statistical analysis yields that the most significant variable was the surface finishing for an adjusted R2 of 90%. The difference of shear stress of 20.69 and 12.67 MPa was obtained for the mechanical and chemical roughening respectively, since the difference in wettability was around 78 and 113° for the same surface finishing. According to analyze the combination of factors for a shear stress of 21.80 MPa are mechanical roughening, single lap joint and glass beads.
Downloads
References
Adhesive Systems Inc. (2017). Methacrylate Adhesives Bond Similar and Dissimilar Materials. Access 27 Marzo 2018. http://instantca.com/methacrylate/.
ASTM D1002-10 (2010). Standard Test Method for Apparent Shear Strength of Single-Lap-Joint Adhesively Bonded Metal Specimens by Tension Loading (Metal-to-Metal), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
ASTM D7334?08 (2013). Standard Practice for Surface Wettability of Coatings, Substrates and Pigments by Advancing Contact Angle Measurement. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
AWS (2007). Welding Handook. Stainless and Heat Resistant Steels. Vol. 4, Chapter 5, American Welding Society, USA, pp. 255–318. PMCid:PMC2486344
Bauknecht, H., Borst, V., Brede, B., GroB, A., Harknensee, A., MeiB, E., Niermann, D., Peshka, P., Theuerkauff, P., Warratz, T. (2015). Adhesive Bonding Technology and Surfaces Training Handbook for European Adhesive Specialist (EAS), Bremen, Germany, p. 32.
Bergström, U., Brottare, I. (1996). Sheet Steel Handbook, Design Fabrication in high strenght steel. SSAB Tunnplat AB, pp. 64–90.
Bermejo, R., O-oro, J., García-Ledesma, R. (2008). Comportamiento a la fatiga de uniones a solape simple con adhesivo epoxi de acero y acero prepintado. Rev. Metal. 44 (4), 310–316.
Brient, A., Brissot, M., Rouxel, T., Sangleboeuf, J.C. (2011). Influence of Grinding Parameters on Glass Workpieces Surface Finish Using Response Surface Methodology. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 133 (4), 044501. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4004317
Cruz, C., Hiyane, G., Mosquera-Artamonov, J.D., Salgado, J.M. (2014). Optimización del proceso de soldadura GTAW en placas de Ti6Al4V. Soldag. Insp. 19 (1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-92242014000100002
Cruz-González, C.E., Gala-Barrón, H.I., Mosquera-Artamonov, J.D., Gámez-Cuatzin, H. (2016). Efecto de la corriente pulsada en el proceso de soldadura GTAW en titanio 6Al4V con y sin metal de aporte. Rev. Metal. 52 (3), e071. https://doi.org/10.3989/revmetalm.071
Dyamenahalli, K., Famili, A., Shandas, R. (2015). Characterization of shape-memory polymers for biomedical applications. In: Shape Memory Polymers for Biomedical Applications. Elsevier, pp. 35–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-85709-698-2.00003-9
Ebnesajjad, S., Landrock, A.H. (2009). Adhesive Applications and Bond Processes. In: Adhesives Technology Handbook. Chapter 8, Elsevier, pp. 206–234.
Ebnesajjad, S., Landrock, A.H. (2015a). Introduction and Adhesion Theories. In: Adhesives Technology Handbook. Chapter 1, Elservier, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-35595-7.00001-2
Ebnesajjad, S., Landrock, A.H. (2015b). Material Surface Preparation Techniques. In: Adhesives Technology Handbook. Chapter 3, Elsevier, pp. 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-35595-7.00003-6
Feng, C.-X., Kusiak, A. (2000). Robust Tolerance Synthesis With the Design of Experiments Approach. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 122 (3), 520–528. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1285860
Jin, J., Shi, J. (2000). Diagnostic Feature Extraction From Stamping Tonnage Signals Based on Design of Experiments. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 122 (2), 360–369. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.538926
Karachalios, E.F., Adams, R.D., da Silva, F.M. (2013). Single lap joints loaded in tension with ductile steel adherends. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 43, 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.017
Kreibich, U.T., Marcantonio, A.F. (1987). New Developments in Structural Adhesives for the Automotive Industry. J. Adhesion 22 (2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218468708074998
Kubiak, K.J., Mathia, T.G., Wilson, M.C. (2009). Methology for metrology of wettability versus roughness of engineering surfaces. Proceeding of 14th International Congress of Metrology, Paris.
Kubiak, K.J., Wilson, M.C., Mathia, T.G., Carval, P. (2011a). Wettability versus roughness of engineering surfaces. Wear 271 (3–4), 523–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2010.03.029
Kubiak, K.J., Wilson, M.C., Mathia, T., Carras, S. (2011b). Dynamics of contact line motion during the wetting of rough surfaces and correlation with topographical surface parameters. Scanning 33 (5), 370–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.20289 PMid:21938731
Lanzotti, A., Martorelli, M., Staiano, G. (2015). Understanding Process Parameter Effects of RepRap Open-Source Three-Dimensional Printers Through a Design of Experiments Approach. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 137 (1), 011017. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029045
Mori, K.I., Bay, N., Fratini, L., Micari, F., Tekkaya, A.E. (2013). Joining by plastic deformation. CIRP Annals 62 (2), 673–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2013.05.004
Pappas, D.D., Bujanda, A., Yim, J.H., Stawhecker, K., Orlicki, J., Demaree, J., Jensen, R. (2009). Chemical and Topological Study of Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treated Fibers and Polymer Films. Technical Conference, 52nd, Society of Vacuum Coaters, Santa Clara, CA.
Park, K.D., Kim, J., Yang, S.J., Yao, A., Park, J.B. (2003). Preliminary study of interfacial shear strength between PMMA precoated UHMWPE acetabular cup and PMMA bone cement. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 15 (65), 272–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.10006 PMid:12687720
Petrie, E.M. (2007). Theories of Adhesion. In: Handbook of Adhesives and Sealants. Chapter 2, New York, USA, Mac Graw-Hill, pp. 39–57.
Pocius, A.V. (2012). The Relationship of Surface Science and Adhesion Science. In: Adhesion and Adhesives Technology. Chapter 6, Hanser Publishers, pp. 145–179. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446431775.006
Shanahan, M., Possart, W. (2011). Wetting of Solids. In: Handbook of Adhesion Technology. Adams, R.D., da Silva, L., Oschner, A. (Eds), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 65–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01169-6_4
Shimizu, K., Malmos, K., Hjarbæk, A., Uttrup, S., Daasberj, K., Hinge, M. (2014). Improved Adhesion Between PMMA and Stainless Steel Modified with PMMA Brushes. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 6 (23), 21308–21315. https://doi.org/10.1021/am5062823 PMid:25348044
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
